4.7 Article

Is the Doce River elutriate or its water toxic to Astyanax lacustris (Teleostei: Characidae) three years after the Samarco mining dam collapse?

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 736, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139644

关键词

Enzyme; Metals; Sediment; Fish; Environmental disaster

资金

  1. Research and Innovation Fundation of Espirito Santo (FAPES) [19/2017]
  2. Brazilian Coordination for the Qualification of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2015, after the Fundao dam failure, in Minas Gerais State, Brazil, around 50 million cubic meters of sludge from iron mining tailings were discharged into the Doce River. After the dam collapse, surpassing concentrations of metals were observed in the river sediment, which could be harmful to aquatic organisms, including the fishes. The present study aimed to evaluate the toxic effects of both elutriate and water, collected from the Doce River, on Astyanax lacustris three years after the dam failure. A bioassay was carried out through subchronic exposure to Doce River water (E0) and three elutriate concentrations (10, 50 and 100%). Biochemical analyses (CAT, GST, AChE), metal bioaccumulation assays and calculation of the integrated biomarker response index, version 2 (IBRv2) were performed. The outcomes uncovered deleterious consequences on organisms exposed to E0, with AChE inhibition and bioaccumulation of Fe and Mn in both liver and gills. IBRv2 values were more elevated in fishes exposed to E0 for all tissues. Thus, the elutriate was not harmful for the assessed fishes, since complexing agents presented in the sediment, such as goethite and hematite, may have triggered metals' chelation. In this scenario, the elutriate may have acted as a protective agent for the subjected organisms, unlike the Doce River waters, in which contaminants were proven to be hazardous for the aquatic biota. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据