4.8 Article

Viral epitope profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals cross-reactivity and correlates of severity

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 370, 期 6520, 页码 1058-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abd4250

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH AI121394, AI139538]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  3. Fast Grant award
  4. Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH
  5. Executive Committee on Research, MGH
  6. MassCPR
  7. National Institutes of Health
  8. Department of Defense [AI138318, AR070253, W81XWH-16-1-0464]
  9. NIH/NIAID
  10. Pemberton-Trinity Fellowship
  11. Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship [201387/Z/16/Z]
  12. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  13. Mark and Lisa Schwartz Foundation
  14. Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness
  15. Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard
  16. VoVRN
  17. Wellcome Trust [201387/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding humoral responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical for improving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines. Deep serological profiling of 232 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and 190 pre-COVID-19 era controls using VirScan revealed more than 800 epitopes in the SARS-CoV-2 proteome, including 10 epitopes likely recognized by neutralizing antibodies. Preexisting antibodies in controls recognized SARS-CoV-2 ORF1, whereas only COVID-19 patient antibodies primarily recognized spike protein and nucleoprotein. A machine learning model trained on VirScan data predicted SARS-CoV-2 exposure history with 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity; a rapid Luminex-based diagnostic was developed from the most discriminatory SARS-CoV-2 peptides. Individuals with more severe COVID-19 exhibited stronger and broader SARS-CoV-2 responses, weaker antibody responses to prior infections, and higher incidence of cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus 1, possibly influenced by demographic covariates. Among hospitalized patients, males produce stronger SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses than females.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据