4.3 Article

Why people like or dislike large wood in rivers-a representative survey of the general public in Germany

期刊

RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 187-197

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rra.3743

关键词

choice experiment; flooding experience; general public; large wood; online survey; river landscapes; river restoration

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN)
  3. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) in Germany [01LC1322F]
  4. BMBF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the majority of German participants believe in the benefits of reintroducing large wood, while some are concerned about its danger, especially for canoeists or during floods. Females, individuals with higher education levels, the youngest and oldest age groups, as well as frequent river visitors, tend to prefer larger quantities of large wood. With the increasing commitment of young people to environmental issues, setting up specific environmental education opportunities for this group along the river may significantly increase acceptance of reintroducing large wood.
For the restoration of medium and small rivers, the reintroduction of large wood (LW) is crucial. Despite the wide communication of the ecological key functions of LW, residents rejected its reintroduction in a restoration project at the river Mulde (Dessau-Rosslau, Germany). To determine whether this is a local or widespread phenomenon in Germany, we investigated (a) the German population's attitude toward LW, (b) preferred quantities of LW introduction, and (c) the effects of flood experiences and other sociodemographic characteristics on these preferences. We conducted a nationwide and representative online survey (n= 2,100), including rating-scale statements and a choice experiment (CE). Regarding the rating statements, we found that a majority of respondents (57-67%) is convinced of the advantages of LW reintroduction. However, 47-60% considered LW to be dangerous for canoeists or during floods. For the CE (n= 743), we defined an LW attribute and added information on possible effects. Conditional logit models showed a strong preference for the highest amount of LW, with an odds ratio 5.47 times higher than for the status quo without LW. We also found that personal flood experiences reduce the preferred LW quantities. In contrast, females, higher educational levels, the youngest and oldest age groups, and especially frequent river visitors preferred higher LW amounts. Since the commitment of young people to environmental issues is currently increasing, we believe that specific environmental education opportunities for this group located along the river can contribute significantly to increase acceptance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据