3.9 Article

ANTI-PD-1 AND ANTI-PD-L1 ANTIBODIES AS IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST CANCER: A STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVE

出版社

INST NACIONAL NUTRICION
DOI: 10.24875/RIC.20000341

关键词

PD-1; PD-L1; Therapeutic antibodies; Cancer immunotherapy; Anti-PD-1; Anti-PD-L1

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) [A1-S-18285]
  2. Catedras CONACYT [639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PD-1 and PD-L1 play crucial roles in T cell immunosuppression, with therapeutic antibodies targeting them showing broad clinical applications; however, these targeted therapies are not without adverse effects; understanding the structural domains recognized by antibodies can guide the development of new PD-1 and PD-L1 blocking agents.
Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1), play key roles in the suppression of the cytotoxic activity of T cells. PD-L1 is overexpressed on various types of cancer cells, leading to immune evasion. In the past decade, therapeutic antibodies that target the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have been developed to inhibit the immune suppression triggered by these two proteins. At present, five antibodies (two anti-PD-1 and three anti-PD-L1) have received approval by regulatory agencies in the US and Europe. In this work, we aimed to review their clinical applications and adverse effects. Furthermore, using their reported crystal structures, we discuss the similarities and differences between the PD-1/PD-L1 interface and the epitopes that are recognized by the antibodies. Detailed analyses of the contact residues involved in the ligand-receptor and target-antibody interactions have shown partial overlap. Altogether, the data presented here demonstrate that: (1) in contrast to other therapeutic antibodies, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 has a wide range of clinical applications; (2) these targeted therapies are not exempt from adverse effects; and (3) the characterization of the structural domains that are recognized by the antibodies can guide the development of new PD-1- and PD-L1-blocking agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据