4.5 Review

Covid-19 and kidney injury: Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms

期刊

REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2176

关键词

acute kidney injury; angiotensin; bardikinin; coronovirus; proteinuria; renal injury; SARS-CoV-2

类别

资金

  1. Kidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kidney involvement in Covid-19 mainly presents as proteinuria and acute kidney injury, with mechanisms including direct viral infection of kidney cells, immune dysregulation, and other factors. Understanding the pathophysiology is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies.
The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has turned into a life-threatening pandemic disease (Covid-19). About 5% of patients with Covid-19 have severe symptoms including septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and the failure of several organs, while most of them have mild symptoms. Frequently, the kidneys are involved through direct or indirect mechanisms. Kidney involvement mainly manifests itself as proteinuria and acute kidney injury (AKI). The SARS-CoV-2-induced kidney damage is expected to be multifactorial; directly it can infect the kidney podocytes and proximal tubular cells and based on an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) pathway it can lead to acute tubular necrosis, protein leakage in Bowman's capsule, collapsing glomerulopathy and mitochondrial impairment. The SARS-CoV-2-driven dysregulation of the immune responses including cytokine storm, macrophage activation syndrome, and lymphopenia can be other causes of the AKI. Organ interactions, endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability, rhabdomyolysis, and sepsis are other potential mechanisms of AKI. Moreover, lower oxygen delivery to kidney may cause an ischaemic injury. Understanding the fundamental molecular pathways and pathophysiology of kidney injury and AKI in Covid-19 is necessary to develop management strategies and design effective therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据