4.7 Article

Adaptive Bayesian support vector regression model for structural reliability analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107286

关键词

Support vector regression; Bayesian inference; Reliability analysis; Active learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51775439]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-IV-0009-0046]
  3. Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University [CX201933]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a structural reliability analysis method based on Bayesian support vector regression (SVR) model, which features point-wise probabilistic prediction while keeping the structural risk minimization principle. The method determines the optimal hyperparameters by maximizing Bayesian model evidence and presents two active learning algorithms based on the SVR model to estimate large and small failure probabilities of complex structures. Four benchmark examples are used to validate the performance of the proposed method.
In this paper, Bayesian support vector regression (SVR) model is developed for structural reliability analysis adaptively. Two SVR models, namely, least-square SVR and epsilon-SVR, are constructed under the Bayesian inference framework with a square loss function and a epsilon-insensitive square one respectively. In this framework, a Gaussian process prior is assigned to the regression function, and maximum posterior estimate results in a SVR problem. The proposed Bayesian SVR models provide point-wise probabilistic prediction while keeps the structural risk minimization principle, and it allows us to determine the optimal hyper-parameters by maximizing Bayesian model evidence. Two active learning algorithms are presented based on the Bayesian SVR models to estimate large and small failure probability of complex structure with limited model evaluations respectively. Four benchmark examples are employed to validate the performance of the presented method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据