4.6 Article

Factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures in the UK: a cross-sectional survey

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 41-52

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.024

关键词

COVID-19; Behaviour; Social distancing; Physical distancing; Government measures; Adherence

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response
  2. Public Health England
  3. King's College London
  4. University of East Anglia
  5. NIHR HPRU in Behavioural Science and Evaluation
  6. University of Bristol
  7. NIHR HPRU in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections
  8. NIHR HPRU in Gastrointestinal Infections
  9. NIHR HPRU Emergency Preparedness and Response
  10. MRC COVID-19 Rapid Response call [MC_PC_19071]
  11. MRC [MC_PC_19071] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures due to COVID-19 in the UK. Study design: Online cross-sectional survey. Methods: Data were collected between 6th and 7th May 2020. A total of 2240 participants living in the UK aged 18 years or older were recruited from YouGov's online research panel. Results: A total of 217 people (9.7%) reported that they or someone in their household had symptoms of COVID-19 (cough or high temperature/fever) in the last 7 days. Of these people, 75.1% had left the home in the last 24 h (defined as non-adherent). Men were more likely to be non-adherent, as were people who were less worried about COVID-19, and who perceived a smaller risk of catching COVID-19. Adherence was associated with having received help from someone outside your household. Results should be taken with caution as there was no evidence for associations when controlling for multiple analyses. Of people reporting no symptoms in the household, 24.5% had gone out shopping for nonessentials in the last week (defined as non-adherent). Factors associated with non-adherence and with a higher total number of outings in the last week included decreased perceived effectiveness of government `lockdown' measures, decreased perceived severity of COVID-19 and decreased estimates of how many other people were following lockdown rules. Having received help was associated with better adherence. Conclusions: Adherence to self-isolation is poor. As we move into a new phase of contact tracing and self-isolation, it is essential that adherence is improved. Communications should aim to increase knowledge about actions to take when symptomatic or if you have been in contact with a possible COVID-19 case. They should also emphasise the risk of catching and spreading COVID-19 when out and about and the effectiveness of preventative measures. Using volunteer networks effectively to support people in isolation may promote adherence. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据