4.6 Article

Towards the targeted assessment of relevant problems: Optimization of the distress Thermometer for adult neuro-oncological patients

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2057-2066

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.5564

关键词

brain cancer; brain tumour; distress thermometer; psycho-oncological screening; psycho-oncology; psychosocial screening; targeted assessment

资金

  1. Familie Mehdorn Stiftung
  2. Projekt DEAL
  3. German Cancer Society
  4. Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Generic psychosocial screening tools may not reflect the unique symptom profile of brain tumour patients (BTPs). The aim was to adapt the problem list of the distress thermometer (DT) for BTPs. Methods: First, items of low relevance for BTPs were identified on basis of retrospective analyses. Second, relevant yet missing problems were identified via an extensive literature search, qualitative interviews with BTPs and experts, as well as an online expert survey. The resulting raw version of the adapted problem list in BTPs was subsequently pretested. Results: In the first part, data of n = 657 BTPs were analysed. Twelve items (20%) were excluded in this step as they proved to be less relevant for BTPs (i.e., items were endorsed by less than 10% and without significant correlations to patients' DT score). In the second part, qualitative interviews and the online survey with 102 professionals led to the addition of 21 new and the modification and condensation of 17 relevant problems specific for BTPs. This adapted list was than successfully pretested in n = 19 patients, leading to the 'distress thermometer brain tumour problem list' (DT-BT), consisting of 42 relevant problems. Conclusion: The adapted problem list for the DT particularly reflects the neurological and psychosocial burden of an intracranial tumour and allows for the targeted assessment of the specific burdens and needs of BTPs. Our revised version of the DTs problem list (DT-BT) should in the next step be widely validated in multinational samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据