4.7 Review

Uric acid levels in subjects with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113305

关键词

Schizophrenia; First episode psychosis; Uric acid; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81830117]
  2. Research Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2016104]
  3. Tibetan Medicine in Qinghai Province [2016104]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [2016A030313491]
  5. Science & Technical Plan of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China [201804010118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association between schizophrenia (SZ) and uric acid (UA) levels has been suggested for many years, but without solid evidence. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all case-control studies examining the serum and plasma UA levels in SZ subjects in comparison to those in healthy controls. Relevant studies published before October 29, 2018, were searched in the main electronic databases, and 17 studies were finally included into the meta-analysis after screening with the criteria. Our results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences of the UA levels between SZ subjects and healthy controls. Further subgroup analyses of the antipsychotic status reported the same finding. Subgroup analyses of clinical status showed that UA levels were decreased in subjects with first episode psychosis (FEP). The subgroup analyses of gender and ethnicity demonstrated that UA levels were decreased in male subjects and in Americans with SZ. Overall, these findings strengthen the clinical evidence that FEP is accompanied by increased oxidative stress response. Reduced UA levels may be a potential risk factor for SZ in male and in the Americans. However, whether there is a causal relationship between the reduced UA levels and the development of SZ deserves further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据