4.7 Article

Intermediate band solar cells: Present and future

期刊

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 705-713

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3351

关键词

high efficiency; intermediate band; solar cell

资金

  1. Comunidad de Madrid [P2018/EMT-4308]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [TEC2017-92301-EXP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intermediate band solar cell (IBSC) has attracted significant attention as a high-efficiency photovoltaic technology. While IBSC research has reached a mature stage theoretically and experimentally, there is confusion about the transition from proof of concept to high efficiency. Researchers believe that further exploration is needed to determine the next steps in developing IBSC technology.
In the quest for high-efficiency photovoltaics (PV), the intermediate band solar cell (IBSC) was proposed in 1997 as an alternative to tandem solar cells. The IBSC offers 63% efficiency under maximum solar concentration using a single semiconductor material. This high-efficiency limit attracted the attention of the PV community, yielding to numerous intermediate band (IB) studies and IBSC prototypes employing a plethora of candidate IB materials. As a consequence, the principles of operation of the IBSC have been demonstrated, and the particularities and difficulties inherent to each different technological implementation of the IBSC have been reasonably identified and understood. From a theoretical and experimental point of view, the IBSC research has reached a mature stage. Yet we feel that, driven by the large number of explored materials and technologies so far, there is some confusion about what route the IBSC research should take to transition from the proof of concept to high efficiency. In this work, we give our view on which the next steps should be. For this, first, we briefly review the theoretical framework of the IBSC, the achieved experimental milestones, and the different technological approaches used, with special emphasis on those recently proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据