4.8 Article

Molecular causes of an evolutionary shift along the parasitism-mutualism continuum in a bacterial symbiont

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005536117

关键词

transmission mode; host-microbe interaction; virulence evolution; intracellular bacteria; chlamydia

资金

  1. European Research Council (EVOCHLAMY) [281633]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [DOC 69-B]
  3. InfectERA project Eugenpath [I1628-B22]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [281633] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Symbiosis with microbes is a ubiquitous phenomenon with a massive impact on all living organisms, shaping the world around us today. Theoretical and experimental studies show that vertical transmission of symbionts leads to the evolution of mutualistic traits, whereas horizontal transmission facilitates the emergence of parasitic features. However, these studies focused on phenotypic data, and we know little about underlying molecular changes at the genomic level. Here, we combined an experimental evolution approach with infection assays, genome resequencing, and global gene expression analysis to study the effect of transmission mode on an obligate intracellular bacterial symbiont. We show that a dramatic shift in the frequency of genetic variants, coupled with major changes in gene expression, allow the symbiont to alter its position in the parasitism-mutualism continuum depending on the mode of between-host transmission. We found that increased parasitism in horizontally transmitted chlamydiae residing in amoebae was a result of processes occurring at the infectious stage of the symbiont's developmental cycle. Specifically, genes involved in energy production required for extracellular survival and the type III secretion system-the symbiont's primary virulence mechanism-were significantly up-regulated. Our results identify the genomic and transcriptional dynamics sufficient to favor parasitic or mutualistic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据