4.6 Article

Mineral-derived Li4SiO4-based adsorbent for post-combustion CO2 capture: An experimental and kinetic investigation

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 5339-5346

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.299

关键词

Mineral Si-sources; Li4SiO4-based adsorbent; Post-combustion CO2 capture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the feasibility of using different natural minerals as Si sources to prepare Li4SiO4-based adsorbents, with pumicestone identified as a potential alternative material. The Si content in the minerals directly influences the adsorption capacity of the adsorbents.
Li4SiO4-based adsorbent is considered as a promising choice for the CO2 removal from power plants'; flue gases. However, the relatively high raw materials cost still limits its industrial applications. In this work, aiming to reduce the cost of Si-source, three novel natural occurring minerals including the pumicestone, the montmorillonite and the attapulgite were employed as Si-sources for the production of Li4SiO4-based ad-sorbents. The phase composition, surface morphology as well as the cyclic CO2 ad-desorption performance of obtained adsorbents were experimentally and kinetically investigated. It is found that the Si content of minerals directly determines the adsorption capacity of adsorbents, resulting in a relatively high and stable capacity of nearly 0.1 g/g within 22 cycles for the pumicestone derived adsorbent compared with other ad-sorbents obtained from minerals. Moreover, the excess Ca inside the minerals is found forming CaO, which is harmful to the desorption performance of adsorbent owing to the occurrence of Li-Ca&-CO2 interactions. As a consequence, Si-source with high Ca content was proven inadaptable for the synthesis of Li4SiO4-based adsorbent, which provides guidance for the future selection of mineral Si-sources in this field. (C) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据