4.4 Article

Discussing non-invasive prenatal testing on Reddit: The benefits, the concerns, and the comradery

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 100-110

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5841

关键词

-

资金

  1. Genome Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research analyzed discussions on the social media platform Reddit regarding the use of NIPT. Overall, NIPT is viewed as valuable and desired, with discussions highlighting both benefits and concerns. Some concerns include cost-related barriers to access, testing-related anxiety, and result interpretation, with NIPT often portrayed as offering peace of mind and preparation for possible outcomes.
Objective As the use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) increases, its benefits and concerns are being examined through surveys, qualitative studies, and bioethical analysis. However, only scant research has examined public discourse on the topic. This research examined NIPT discussions on the social media platform Reddit. Method Content and qualitative description analysis was performed on 98 NIPT discussions (2682 comments), obtained by inputting NIPT into Reddit's search engine. Results Detailing of benefits and concerns was found in collaborative and supportive discussions. Overall, NIPT is seen as valuable and desirable. Some concerns focused on cost-related barriers to access, anxiety related to testing, and interpretation of results. NIPT is often portrayed as offering peace of mind and is sometimes described as a means of preparing for possible outcomes. Conclusion In the discussions analyzed, NIPT is seen, overall, as valuable and greater access to it is desired. Some questions and concerns about NIPT were evident. Reddit stands as a valuable and appreciated tool for individuals wishing to discuss NIPT and to solicit and share information, opinions, and experiences. Health care providers should consider the ways social platforms such as Reddit can be engaged to better inform and educate the public.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据