4.2 Article

The Lombardy Emergency Medical System Faced with COVID-19: The Impact of Out-of-Hospital Outbreak

期刊

PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1824051

关键词

Emergency Medical System (EMS); COVID-19; Lombardy; pandemic; respiratory failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The Lombardy region was among the areas most affected by COVID-19 infection worldwide; the Lombardy Emergency Medical System (EMS) responded immediately to this emergency. We analyzed several critical aspects to understand what occurred in that region. Methods This retrospective study compares the events managed by the dispatch center and the characteristics of the patients transported to the hospital -age, sex, SpO(2), deaths- managed by the EMS in Brescia and Bergamo provinces between March-April 2020 and March-April 2019. Ambulances' waiting time at the hospitals before discharging patients and the patients' severity at emergency department admission were also analyzed. Results EMS managed 37,340 events in March-April 2020, +51.5% versus 2019. Breathing or Infective events reported to the dispatch center increased more than ten-fold (OR 25.1, p < 0.0001) in March 2020 and two-fold in April 2020 compared to 2019 (OR 3, p < 0.0001). Deaths increased +246% (OR 1.7, p < 0.0001), and patients not transported to hospital +481% (OR 2.9, p < 0.0001) in March 2020 compared to 2019. In some hospitals, ambulances waited more than one hour before discharging the patients, and the emergency departments doubled the admission of critically ill patients. Transported patients for Breathing or Infective events were primarily males (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001). The patients had lower SpO(2)in 2020 than in 2019 and they were younger. Conclusions The Lombardy region experienced an unexpected outbreak in an extremely short timeframe and in a limited area. The EMS coped with this pandemic, covering an extremely higher number of requests, with a ten-fold increase in the number of events managed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据