4.7 Article

An experimental investigation on the thermo-hydraulic properties of CuO and Fe3O4 oil-based nanofluids in inclined U-tubes: A comparative study

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 379, 期 -, 页码 191-202

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.10.055

关键词

Heat transfer; Friction factor; Oil-based nanofluids; Inclined U-tube; Experimental study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a comparative experimental investigation on the friction factor and heat transfer of oil-based nanofluids (CuO and Fe3O4 with 0.5%, 1%, and 2% mass concentrations) inside inclined U-tubes. The results showed that using nanoparticles increased the convective heat transfer coefficient, with the best performance observed in 0.5% CuO and 1% Fe3O4 samples.
U-tubes are nowadays widely used in large industries, especially in heat exchangers, as well as solar absorbers. Optimizing and increasing the thermal efficiency of heat exchangers reduces fossil fuel consumption and costs savings. A comparative experimental study was conducted on friction factor, and heat transfer of oil-based nanofluids flow (CuO and Fe3O4 with 0.5%, 1%, and 2% mass concentrations) inside inclined U-tube at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees inclination angles under constant heat flux. The nanofluids prepared in two steps method by dispersing nanoparticles in SN-500 base oil. The tests were performed in five different flow rates. The results showed that compared to the base fluid, using nanoparticles increased the friction factor and convective heat transfer coefficient. According to the results, it was found that the highest heat transfer rate belonged to 0.5% CuO and 1% Fe3O4, and the maximum increase in Nusselt number for nanofluids happened at 30 degrees inclination angles. Finally, it was found that the Fe3O4 nanofluid with 1% concentration had the highest value among all the test nanofluids samples in horizontal and inclined modes. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据