4.5 Article

Graphene oxide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocompsite polyamide nanofiltration membrane for dyeing-printing wastewater treatment

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 690-702

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.5122

关键词

graphene oxide; interfacial polymerization; multi-walled carbon nanotubes; nanofiltration membrane

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY19E030005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The GO/MWCNTs modified NF membranes showed improved surface properties, with the best performing membrane having high water flux, maintained high rejection rate for pollutants, and better anti-fouling performance. They are suitable for treating dyeing-printing wastewater effectively.
Graphene oxide (GO)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) modified nanofiltration (NF) membranes were successfully fabricated by interfacial polymerization of piperazine (PIP) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (TMC). Compared with the pristine polyamide (PA) membrane and GO membrane, the typical structure of the granular protrusions on the surface of the GO/MWCNTs membrane gradually disappeared, and a regular ordered morphology appeared. The membrane thickness and surface roughness were increased according to the results of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The contact angle of GO/MWCNTs NF membranes progressively decreased from 57 degrees to 23 degrees, indicating the enhancement of surface hydrophilicity. The best NF performance was achieved when the ratio of GO to MWCNTs was 6:3 (G-M-3). The water flux was 55.6 L/m(2).h, which was 33.7% higher than that of the GO membrane, and the rejection rate for Na(2)SO(4)was maintained at approximately 94%. Both modified NF membranes could treat actual dyeing-printing wastewater effectively. The anti-fouling performance of G-M-3 was better than that of G3. Therefore, GO/MWCNTs-modified NF membranes have a good application prospects in the field of wastewater treatment and water purification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据