4.7 Article

Hypercrosslinked porous organic polymers based on tetraphenylanthraquinone for CO2 uptake and high-performance supercapacitor

期刊

POLYMER
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122857

关键词

Tetraphenylanthraquinone; Thermal stability; CO2 uptake; Energy storage performance

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2638-E-002-003-MY2, 106-2221-E-110-067-MY3, 108-2221-E-110-014-MY3, 108-2218-E-110-013-MY3]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773214]
  3. SAS-MOST Joint Research Project Tough-VigNet SAS-MOST JRP [2019/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We successfully synthesized two different kinds of hyper-crosslinked porous organic polymers (CPOPs) based on tetraphenylanthraquinone units by a reaction of 9,10-bis(diphenylmethylene)- 9,10-dihydroanthracene (An-4Ph) as the building unit with formaldehyde dimethyl acetal and 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine as two external crosslinkers by using a simple and friendly one-step Friedel-Crafts polymerization in the presence anhydrous FeCl3 as a catalyst to afford An-CPOP-1 and An-CPOP-2 as a black solid with high yield, respectively. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) and NMR spectroscopy were confirmed the chemical structures of the synthesized monomers and the corresponding polymers. Both An-CPOP-1 and An-CPOP-2 showed amorphous character, outstanding thermal stability, and high BET surface area (up to 1000 m(2)/g) with micropomsity and mesoporosity architectures based on XRD, TGA analyses and N-2 adsorption/desorption measurements. Interestingly, TEM and SEM images revealed that An-CPOP-1 had regular tubular nanotubes structure without using template or surfactant or carbonization at the elevated temperature. The as-prepared An-CPOP-2 exhibited a high specific capacitance of 98.4 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1) and excellent cycling stability (95.3% capacitance retention over 2000 cycles), which could be used as good material for energy storage application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据