4.7 Article

Suppressed crystallization and enhanced gas permeability in thin films of cellulose acetate blends

期刊

POLYMER
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122790

关键词

Cellulose acetate blends; Crystallinity confinement; Membranes for gas separation

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) under the CAREER award [1554236]
  2. Japan PublicPrivate Partnership Student Study Abroad Program - TOBITATE Young Ambassador Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Film thickness and blending can affect crystallization and chain dynamics of semi-crystalline polymers, particularly for submicron films. Herein we apply these insights to elucidate a long-standing puzzle for industrial asymmetric membranes for CO2 removal from natural gas, which are based on blends of cellulose diacetate (CDA with a degree of acetylation or DS of 2.45) and cellulose triacetate (CTA with a DS of 2.87). The asymmetric membranes comprise thin selective layers (similar to 100 nm) and have been reported to exhibit gas permeability much higher than the bulk blends. We hypothesize that the film thickness and blending confine crystallization and decrease the crystallinity, increasing gas permeability while retaining high selectivity. Specifically, we systematically determined crystallinity for CTA and two blends with various thicknesses ranging from approximate to 500 nm to approximate to 20 mu m. Adding 75 mass% CTA in CDA (CDA-CTA75) decreases the crystallinity from 34 vol% to 23 vol% at approximate to 20 mu m (accompanied by CO2 permeability increase from 3.9 Barrer to 7.1 Barrer), while decreasing the film thickness of CDA-CTA75 from approximate to 20 mu m to approximate to 1.0 mu m decreases the crystallinity from 23 vol% to 13 vol% and increases CO2 permeability from 7.1 Barrer to 14 Barrer. Understanding polymer chain dynamics and crystallization in thin films can be instrumental in designing high-performance membranes for industrial gas separations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据