4.7 Article

A Leaf out of Nature's Book: Hairy Nanocelluloses for Bioinspired Mineralization

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 4627-4634

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00713

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  2. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec Nature et technologies (FRQNT, Quebec, Canada)
  3. Centre for Self-Assembled Chemical Structures (CSACS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quest for designing new materials to unravel and mimic the biogenic mechanisms behind the formation of superior natural structures through biomineraization has stimulated interest in a broad range of disciplines. Here, we show that Cellulose, the basic structural material of trees, and the most abundant yet inactive biopolymer in the world, can be chemically engineered to yield a new class of nanocelluloses with a ppm-level biomimetic effect. We introduce hairy nanocelluloses, namely, electrosterically stabilized nano crystalline cellulose (ENCC) and dicarboxylated cellulose (DCC), as the first polysaccharide-based materials to address key biomimetic material design concerns, involving (i) an all-natural backbone, (ii) no anthropogenic effects such as eutrophication due to the N-, P-, and/or S-bearing groups, (iii) capability for macroscale mineralization, (iv) no extreme and/or controlled reaction condition requirements, (v) a high efficiency at extremely low concentrations, and (vi) strong polymorph selectivity. In a model system under ambient conditions, the bioinspired mineralization of calcium carbonate with ENCC/DCC resulted in macroscale nacre-like sheets of vaterite, the least thermodynamically stable polymorph of CaCO3, which were then decorated with stabilized microscale lenticular vaterite to unveil the biomimetic mineralization mechanism. The emergence of these advanced sustainable nanomaterials May open new horizons in the field of bioinspired nanoengineering for designing inorganic nanostructures and, hybrid inorganic-organic nanocomposites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据