4.1 Article

Diversity, distribution, endemism and conservation status ofEuphorbia(Euphorbiaceae) in SW Asia and adjacent countries

期刊

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 306, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-020-01705-4

关键词

Biodiversity; Hot spot; Irano-turanian region; Mediterranean region; Saharo-Sindian region; Threatened species

资金

  1. IAPT scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to evaluate the diversity, endemism, distribution and conservation of the genusEuphorbiain SW Asian countries, we generated an updated and annotated checklist of 249 taxa belonging to the current accepted fourEuphorbiasubgenera, 30 sections and five subsections, based on floristic compilations followed by extensive verification of nearly 24,000 herbarium vouchers from the region. We also provide updated distribution maps for 247 of the 249 taxa treated. The predominant group isEuphorbiasubg.Esula, with 19 sections and 184 taxa (176 species), followed by subg.Chamaesyce(six sections, 32 species), subg.Euphorbia(two sections, 21 species) and subg.Athymalus(three sections, 12 species). Turkey, Iran and Syria are the most diverse countries, with 102, 92 and 50 species, respectively. The richest concentration ofEuphorbiaspecies in SW Asia are the eastern part of the Mediterranean region in Lebanon with 27-34 taxa; Alborz, Zagros (Iran), Lesser Caucasus, and Anti-Taurus (S Turkey) with 21-27 taxa each are the second richest areas. The highest number of endemics occurs in Iran (21 taxa), followed by Turkey (12 taxa) and Yemen (7 taxa). All 134 endemic and subendemic taxa were evaluated by the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Among the knownEuphorbiaspecies in the region, 10 of them (4.4%) are adventive. Life-form spectra show that the majority of species (80.7%) are hemicryptophytes, therophytes and chamaephytes. Twelve new records are reported here for Iran, Afghanistan, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar and Turkey, six synonyms and three sectional transfers are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据