4.8 Article

Nanoparticle-mediated gene transformation strategies for plant genetic engineering

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 880-891

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14973

关键词

nanoparticle; plant genetic engineering; transgenic; CRISPR; Cas9; de novoregeneration

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFC1711100]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX09101002-003-002]
  3. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation in China [20ZR1453800]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673550]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant genetic engineering, a recent technological advancement in the field of plant science, is an important tool used to improve crop quality and yield, to enhance secondary metabolite content in medicinal plants or to develop crops for sustainable agriculture. A new approach based on nanoparticle-mediated gene transformation can overcome the obstacle of the plant cell wall and accurately transfer DNA or RNA into plants to produce transient or stable transformation. In this review, several nanoparticle-based approaches are discussed, taking into account recent advances and challenges to hint at potential applications of these approaches in transgenic plant improvement programs. This review also highlights challenges in implementing the nanoparticle-based approaches used in plant genetic engineering. A new technology that improves gene transformation efficiency and overcomes difficulties in plant regeneration has been established and will be used for thede novoproduction of transgenic plants, and CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has accelerated crop improvement. Therefore, we outline future perspectives based on combinations of genome editing, nanoparticle-mediated gene transformation andde novoregeneration technologies to accelerate crop improvement. The information provided here will assist an effective exploration of the technological advances in plant genetic engineering to support plant breeding and important crop improvement programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据