4.3 Article

Improved LOLA elevation maps for south pole landing sites: Error estimates and their impact on illumination conditions

期刊

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2020.105119

关键词

Polar illumination; Moon; Landing sites; Space exploration; LOLA

资金

  1. NASA's Planetary Science Division Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New high-resolution topographic models of lunar south pole landing sites based on LOLA data have reduced geolocation errors significantly. The uncertainties in surface height and slope in the new LDEMs have typical RMS values of 0.30-0.50 m and 1.5-2.5 degrees, respectively.
We present new high-resolution topographic models of 4 high-priority lunar south pole landing sites based exclusively on the laser altimetry data acquired by the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. By iteratively adjusting the LOLA tracks to the LOLA-based digital elevation model (LDEM) in a self-consistent fashion, we reduce the orbital geolocation errors by over a factor of 10 such that the new ground track geolocation uncertainty is similar to 10-20 cm horizontally and similar to 2-4 cm vertically over each 16 x 16 km region. These new and improved 5 m/pix LDEMs will be useful to constrain higher-resolution topographic models derived from imagery, which are not as well controlled geodetically and which can be hindered by shadows. We developed a method to estimate surface height uncertainty in the new LDEMs, which accounts for the reduced orbital errors and interpolation errors by assuming a fractal behavior for the short-scale topography. The LDEM surface height and slope uncertainties have typical RMS values of similar to 0.30-0.50 m and similar to 1.5-2.5 degrees, respectively. Finally, we examine how height uncertainties propagate to variations in horizon elevation and thus the predicted illumination conditions at these polar latitudes, and we show how this error characterization can inform landing site studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据