4.5 Article

Type I interferon signaling limits viral vector priming of CD8+ T cells during initiation of vitiligo and melanoma immunotherapy

期刊

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 683-695

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12935

关键词

autoimmunity; CD8 T cells; melanoma; type I interferon; vaccine immunotherapy; vaccinia virus; vitiligo

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [AR069114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that type I IFN plays an important role in the progression of vitiligo, and blocking type I IFNs may help improve the efficacy of melanoma immunotherapy, as shown by two different mouse models.
Vitiligo is an autoimmune skin disease in which epidermal melanocytes are targeted for destruction by CD8(+) T cells specific for melanocyte/melanoma-shared antigens. IFN gamma is the central cytokine driving disease, but the role of type I IFN in vitiligo remains unclear. We investigated the functional role of type I IFN during vitiligo progression using two different mouse models: one induced with a vaccinia virus (VV) vaccine and one induced with dendritic cells to prime autoimmune T cells. Induction of vitiligo by VV in IFNaR-deficient mice led to the development of severe vitiligo compared with wild-type (WT) mice and was characterized by a significantly enhanced effector CD8(+) T-cell response. Severe vitiligo in this model was a result of VV persistence, because exacerbation of disease in IFNaR-deficient mice was not observed when antigen-pulsed dendritic cells were used to induce vitiligo instead of virus. Treatment of B16F10 melanoma-inoculated mice with VV vaccine therapy also induced a significantly enhanced anti-tumor response in IFNaR-deficient mice compared with WT. These results not only help define the pathways responsible for vitiligo progression but also suggest that blockade of type I IFNs following administration of a VV vaccine may provide increased immunogenicity and efficacy for melanoma immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据