4.7 Review

Hispidulin: A novel natural compound with therapeutic potential against human cancers

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 771-789

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6862

关键词

hispidulin; apoptosis; cell signaling; anticancer mechanism; chemo-sensitization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HIS, a biologically active natural flavone, exhibits multitargeted anticancer activities by modulating multiple signaling pathways related to cancer initiation and progression. This review provides information on the natural sources, anticancer mechanism, cellular targets, and chemo-sensitizing potential of HIS.
Cancer is one of the most devastating disease and leading cause of death worldwide. The conventional anticancer drugs are monotarget, toxic, expensive and suffer from drug resistance. Development of multi-targeted drugs from natural products has emerged as a new paradigm to overcome aforementioned conventionally encountered obstacles. Hispidulin (HIS), is a biologically active natural flavone with versatile biological and pharmacological activities. The anticancer, antimutagenic, antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of HIS have been reported. The aim of this review is to summarize the findings of several studies over the last few decades on the anticancer activity of HIS published in various databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. HIS has been shown to reduce the growth of cancer cells by inducing apoptosis, arresting cell cycle, inhibiting angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis via modulating multiple signaling pathways implicated in cancer initiation and progression. Multitargeted anticancer activity of HIS remains the strongest point for developing it into potential anticancer drug. We also highlighted the natural sources, anticancer mechanism, cellular targets, and chemo-sensitizing potential of HIS. This review will provide bases for design and conduct of further pre-clinical and clinical trials to develop HIS into a lead structure for future anticancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据