4.5 Article

Adsorption characteristics of amino acids on graphene and germanene using dispersion-corrected density functional theory

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114498

关键词

Graphene; Germanene; Amino acids; Dispersion-corrected density functional theory; Adsorption characteristics

资金

  1. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [3/44296]
  2. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran
  3. Swedish Research Council [2016-05366]
  4. Swedish Research Links programme grant [2017-05447]
  5. Vinnova [2016-05366] Funding Source: Vinnova
  6. Swedish Research Council [2017-05447, 2016-05366] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the interaction of five different amino acid molecules with graphene and germanene monolayers using dispersion-corrected density functional theory. It was found that arginine forms the most stable complexes and germanene shows higher sensitivity to amino acids, indicating potential use in bio-integrated electronic devices.
In the present study, we have explored the interaction of five distinct kinds of amino acid molecules namely, arginine (Arg), aspartic acid (Asp), alanine (Ala), asparagine (Asn) and histidine (His) with graphene and germanene monolayers employing dispersion-corrected density functional theory. The dispersion correction incorporated in the computational methodology improves the accuracy of the results by taking into account the long range van der Waals interactions between the adsorbent and adsorbate. Using this method, the equilibrium configuration, energetic, electronic and optical properties of amino acids adsorbed on substrate have systematically been found. It is also found that arginine makes the most stable complexes with graphene and germanene in comparison to the other amino acids used in this study. Compared to graphene, germanene shows higher sensitivity to amino acids indicating that germanene monolayers can be useful for bio-integrated electronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据