4.5 Article

Design of Chitosan Nanocapsules with Compritol 888 ATO® for Imiquimod Transdermal Administration. Evaluation of Their Skin Absorption by Raman Microscopy

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02925-6

关键词

chitosan-nanocapsules; compritol 888 ATO (R); imiquimod; Raman microscopy; transdermal

资金

  1. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico de Chile [FONDECYT 1201482]
  2. Programa de Equipamiento Cientifico y Tecnologico [FONDEQUIP EQM120021, FONDEQUIP EQM130032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Design imiquimod-loaded chitosan nanocapsules for transdermal delivery and evaluate the depth of imiquimod transdermal absorption as well as the kinetics of this absorption using Raman Microscopy, an innovative strategy to evaluate transdermal absorption. This nanovehicle included Compritol 888ATO (R), a novel excipient for formulating nanosystems whose administration through the skin has not been studied until now. Methods Nanocapsules were made by solvent displacement method and their physicochemical properties was measured by DLS and laser-Doppler. For transdermal experiments, newborn pig skin was used. The Raman spectra were obtained using a laser excitation source at 532 nm and a 20/50X oil immersion objective. Results The designed nanocapsules, presented nanometric size (180 nm), a polydispersity index <0.2 and a zeta potential +17. The controlled release effect of Compritol was observed, with the finding that half of the drug was released at 24 h in comparison with control (p < 0.05). It was verified through Raman microscopy that imiquimod transdermal penetration is dynamic, the nanocapsules take around 50 min to penetrate the stratum corneum and 24 h after transdermal administration, the drug was in the inner layers of the skin. Conclusions This study demonstrated the utility of Raman Microscopy to evaluate the drugs transdermal penetration of in the different layers of the skin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据