4.4 Article

Socioeconomic and health care coverage disparities in children, adolescents, and young adults with sarcoma

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 67, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28708

关键词

disparities; insurance status; pediatric cancer; sarcoma; socioeconomic status

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Socioeconomic and health care coverage disparities are established as poor prognostic markers in adults with sarcoma, but few studies examine these differences among pediatric, adolescents and young adults (AYA). This study examines the association between socioeconomic status (SES), insurance status, and disease presentation among children and AYA patients with sarcoma. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-25 years with bone or soft tissue sarcoma from the National Cancer Database. SES assignments were based on estimated median income and education level. Patient demographics and clinical factors were compared by SES and insurance status. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to determine adjusted odds ratios of SES and insurance status on metastatic disease or tumor size >= 5 cm at time of presentation. Results In a cohort of 9112 patients, 2932 (32.1%) had low, 2084 (22.8%) middle, and 4096 (44.9%) high SES. For insurance status, 5864 (64.3%) had private, 2737 (30.0%) public, and 511 (5.6%) were uninsured. Compared to high SES, patients with low SES were more likely to have metastatic disease (OR = 1.16,P = .03) and tumors >= 5 cm (OR = 1.29,P < .01). Compared to private insurance, public and no insurance were associated with metastatic disease (OR = 1.35,P < .01 and OR = 1.32,P = .02) and increased tumors >= 5 cm (OR = 1.28,P < .01 and OR = 1.67,P < .01). Conclusions SES disparities exist among children and AYA patients with sarcoma. Low SES and public or no insurance are associated with advanced disease at presentation. Further studies are needed to identify interventions to improve earlier detection of sarcomas in at-risk children and young adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据