4.1 Review

Continued versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulation for cardiac electronic device implantation: A systematic review

期刊

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 1373-1381

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pace.14091

关键词

anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; defibrillators; hematoma; perioperative care

资金

  1. Canadian Stroke Prevention Intervention Network
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Bayer
  6. BMS-Pfizer Inc.
  7. Population Health Institute Chair in Cardiology Research
  8. E.J. Moran Campbell McMaster University Department ofMedicine career award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Many patients undergoing cardiac device implantation are taking direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC). Continuing DOAC during device implantation may increase periprocedural bleeding risk; however, interrupting DOACs may increase thromboembolic risk. Objective To compare the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma and thromboembolism in patients who have their DOAC continued or interrupted for cardiac device implantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and randomized controlled trial (CENTRAL) until December 2019 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared outcomes after continuing or interrupting DOAC during cardiac device implantation. Independently and in duplicate, reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full text of potentially eligible studies. They then evaluated risk of bias and abstracted data. RCT data were pooled using a fixed-effect model. Quality of evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE). Results Two RCTs, representing 763 patients, and three observational studies met eligibility criteria. In RCTs, continuing DOAC for device implantation compared to interrupting DOAC resulted in no significant difference in clinically significant pocket hematoma (2.1% vs 1.8%; RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.44-3.05) or thromboembolism (0.03% vs 0.03%; RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.06-16.21). Quality of evidence for both outcomes was moderate due to imprecision. Observational studies showed similar results. Conclusions Continuing DOACs for device implantation results in little to no difference in the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma or thromboembolism. Given the ease of stopping and restarting DOACs, interrupting DOACs may be the preferred strategy for most patients. However, whenever continuous therapeutic anticoagulation is desired, DOAC continuation should be preferred over bridging with parenteral anticoagulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据