4.5 Article

Effects of nitrogen on egg-laying inhibition and ovicidal response in planthopper-resistant rice varieties

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 223-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.07.033

关键词

Brown planthopper; Honeydew; Host plant resistance; Nilaparvata lugens; Sogatella furcifera; White-backed planthopper

类别

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia, CSISA)
  2. Global Rice Science Partnership (GRiSP)
  3. Asian Development Bank [RETA 6489]
  4. Global Rice Science Scholarship (GRiSS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of experiments was set up to examine the effects of nitrogen on rice (Oryza sativa L.) resistance against Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) and Sogatella furcifera (Horvath). Egg laying by N. lugens was reduced on the indica variety IR60. Nymph biomass (N. lugens and S. furcifera) was also lower on IR60: this was associated with, low honeydew production and a high proportion of xylem-derived honeydew in N. lugens but not in S. furcifera. Nitrogen increased egg-laying by S. furcifera and increased N. lugens nymph biomass on all varieties tested. Oviposition and egg mortality in both planthopper species were examined on plants at 15, 30 and 45 days after sowing (DAS). Sogatella furcifera laid more eggs on plants at 15 DAS, but laid few eggs during darkness; N. lugens continued to lay eggs on older rice plants (30 DAS) and during darkness. Egg mortality was high on cv. Asiminori, highest at 45 DAS, and higher for S. furcifera than for N. lugens. Mortality of S. furcifera eggs was associated with lesions around the egg clusters. These were more common around clusters laid during the day and suggested induction by Asiminori of an ovicidal response. Egg mortality declined under higher soil nitrogen levels. Results are discussed in the light of improving rice resistance against planthoppers and reducing rates of planthopper adaptation to resistance genes. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据