4.5 Article

How would high priority pests be reported in the Western Australian grains industry?

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 26-33

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.10.005

关键词

General surveillance; Biosecurity; Karnal bunt; Khapra beetle; Russian wheat aphid; Barley stripe rust

类别

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity
  2. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

General surveillance activities have an important role in plant biosecurity for the early detection of pests (includes diseases) and for demonstrating area freedom. Currently general surveillance information for the grains industry in Western Australia is mainly collected though reports of suspect high priority pests to the state Department of Agriculture and Food (DAFWA). Little information is available on the likelihood that members of the grains industry would report a suspect high priority pest, where and who they report pests to, and the factors that influence their decisions to report pests. This study details a survey of members of the grains industry conducted to determine the reporting practices relating to plant pest and diseases in the grains industry. Results of the study indicate that growers preferentially report to agricultural consultants and the local DAFWA staff; whereas agricultural consultants and researchers are more likely to report to the DAFWA head office. Factors that influenced participants' reporting of suspect high priority pests included the ability to eradicate the pest or disease, free examination of suspect samples and the desire for more information about high priority pests. The ranking of factors varied with the role the individual had in the grains industry. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据