4.5 Article

Switching behavior induced by the orientation in triangular graphene molecular junction with graphene nanoribbons electrodes

期刊

OPTIK
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165710

关键词

Density functional theory; Molecular switch; Negative differential resistance; Non-equilibrium Green's functions; Electronic transport

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [11004156, 11204227]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2019JM-083]
  3. Science and Technology Star Project of Shaanxi Province [2016KJXX-45]
  4. Graduate Innovation Foundation of Xi'an Polytechnic University [chx2019059, chx2020030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the electronic transport properties of tailored triangular zigzag graphene nanoribbons with different orientations using density functional theory (DFT). The results show that the orientation of the triangular structure significantly affects the electron transport capacity of the molecular device, with the upward triangular graphene exhibiting potential for future molecular device designs due to its remarkable negative differential resistance behaviors.
This paper investigates the electronic transport properties in tailored triangular zigzag graphene nanoribbons (ZGNRs) with different orientations by applying density functional theory (DFT) based non-equilibrium Green's function method. It can be seen from the results calculated, the orientation of the triangular structure has a great effect on deciding the capacity to transport electrons of the molecular device. From different I-V characteristic curves, an upward and rightward triangular graphene can control the molecular switch on and off states. The peak value of on-off ratio can be 350 at 0.9 V. Furthermore, there is a remarkable negative differential resistance behaviors for the molecular device with upward triangular graphene, indicating that this system will have a widely applied in future molecular devices designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据