4.6 Article

Surface roughness evolution mechanism of the optical aluminum 6061 alloy during low energy Ar+ ion beam sputtering

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 28, 期 23, 页码 34054-34068

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.410023

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51991371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra-smooth surfaces with low contamination and little damage are a great challenge for aluminum optical fabrication. Ion beam sputtering (IBS) has obvious advantages of low contamination and non-contact that make it a perfect method for processing aluminum optics. However, the evolution laws of aluminum surface morphology are quite different from conventional amorphous materials, which affects the roughness change and needs systematic research. Thus, in this paper, the roughness evolution of an aluminum optical surface (i.e., aluminum mirror) subjected to IBS has been studied with experimental and theoretical methods. The surface morphology evolution mechanisms of turning marks and second phase during IBS are revealed. The newly emerging relief morphology and its evolution mechanism are studied in depth. The experimental results find that IBS causes the coarsening of optical surfaces and the appearance of microstructures, leading to the surface quality deterioration. Turning marks have been through the process of deepening and vanish, while second phase generates microstructures on the original surface. The corresponding mechanism is discussed exhaustively. Preferential sputtering, curvature-dependent sputtering and material properties play important roles on surface quality deterioration. A modified roughness evolution mechanism and an improved binary sputtering theory are proposed to describe the polycrystalline sputtering phenomena. The current research can provide a guidance for the application of IBS in aluminum optics manufacture fields. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据