4.6 Article

Spectroscopic study of Nd3+ ion-doped Zn-Al-Ba borate glasses for NIR emitting device applications

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.110018

关键词

Borate glass; Neodymium; Judd-ofelt theory; Luminescence; IR emitting Material

资金

  1. Riset ITB 2019 [91I/I1.C01/PL/2019]
  2. WCU-ITB 2019 [350C/SK/I1.B02/2019]
  3. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
  4. Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University (NPRU)
  5. Chiang Mai University
  6. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi [INT/PORTUGAL/P04/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trivalent neodymium (Nd3+) -doped Zn-Al-Ba borate glasses of composition (60-x) B2O3+20BaO+10Al(2)O(3)+10ZnO + xNd(2)O(3)(x = 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mol%) were prepared by a conventional melt-quenching technique and studied their physical, structural, optical and luminescence properties. The amorphous nature of the glasses has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction patterns. The EDAX data shows percent mass of elements of the glass system. FTIR spectra confirm the formation of BO3 and BO4 groups in the glass structure and compared them with Raman spectra. The Judd-Ofelt theory was adopted to analyze the radiative properties of Nd2O3 -doped glasses to derive oscillator strengths (f), JO parameters (Omega(lambda)=2,4,6), stimulated emission cross-sections (sigma(e)), radiative transition probabilities (A(R)), and branching ratios (beta(R)) of various transitions of Nd3+ ions. The lifetime of the F-4(3/2) level of Nd3+ ions in the glasses decreases with the increase of Nd2O3 concentration due to the shortened distance between Nd3+ ion in the glass structure. The strongest emission intensity is found at 1056 nm (F-4(3/2) -> I-4(11/2) transition) when excited by 808 nm. The optimum concentration of Nd2O3 in the studied glasses is found to be 1.0 mol% based on luminescence intensity. All these results were compared with reported research of Nd3+:glasses to determine the lasing potentiality of studied glasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据