4.6 Article

Value of 10-2 Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma Patients with Early 24-2 Visual Field Loss

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 128, 期 4, 页码 545-553

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.033

关键词

Glaucoma; Perimetry; Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; Sensitivity; Specificity; Visual field; 10-2 test; 24-2 test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the study comparing the 24-2 and 10-2 tests in glaucoma patients with early damage, it was found that the AUC values were not significantly different between the two tests, but the sensitivity of the 24-2 test was higher at matched specificity. The repeatability of test results during follow-up ranged from 55% to 70%.
Purpose: To determine whether the 10-2 test of the Humphrey Field Analyzer detected a higher proportion of abnormal visual fields compared with the 24-2 test in the central 10 degrees of patients with early glaucomatous visual field damage. Design: Prospective observational study. Participants: Patients with open-angle glaucoma and healthy control participants. Methods: All participants underwent a 24-2 and 10-2 test. Only the 12 central test locations of the 24-2 test were included to analyze equivalent visual field areas. The performance of the 2 tests was compared across 4 pointwise criteria: total deviation (TD) and pattern deviation (PD) analyses at the 5% and 2% levels. Analyses also were conducted for 2 pairs of follow-up tests, each performed 4 months apart. Main Outcome Measures: (1) Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), (2) sensitivity at identically matched specificity for the 4 criteria, (3) overlap (entire field and by quadrant) of abnormal visual fields with both tests, and (4) repeatability of the findings in 2 subsequent follow-up tests. Results: One eye each of 97 glaucoma patients (median mean deviation, -2.31 dB) and 65 control participants were included in the study. The AUCs for the 24-2 and 10-2 tests were not significantly different for any of the 4 criteria and ranged from 0.88 to 0.93 and from 0.91 to 0.94, respectively. At matched specificity, the sensitivity of the 24-2 test was significantly higher for all criteria except for PD analysis at 5%. In patients with an abnormal field with either test, the overlap varied from 60% to 86% depending on the criterion, whereas by quadrant, concordance ranged from 70% to 87%. Over the follow-up, the repeatability of test results (both 24-2 and 10-2 abnormal, either abnormal, or both normal) was achieved in 55% to 70% of patients. Conclusions: In this study of glaucoma patients with early damage with the 24-2 test, there was little evidence that adding the 10-2 test revealed additional undetected defects in the central visual field. It may be more prudent to reserve 10-2 testing for following up selected patients with higher risk of central visual field progression. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据