4.7 Article

Free running computations of KCS with different propulsion models

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107563

关键词

URANS; CFD; Free running; Self-propulsion; Discretized propeller; Body-force model

资金

  1. Advanced Research Common Technology Project of CHINA CMC [41407010401, 41407020502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computations of the self-propulsion free running KCS model with 2DOF (heave and pitch) using four different propulsion models are presented. Computations are performed with HUST-Ship, in house URANS CFD code developed for ship hydrodynamics. PI speed controller is used to find the propeller rotational speed that could balance the thrust and resistance. Single-phase level-set approach is used for free surface simulation. Propulsion models include discretized propeller, the descriptive body force based on open water curve and simple Hough and Ordway approach, OUM (Osaka University Method) based on simplified quasi-steady two-dimensional BEMT (blade element momentum theory) and modified OUM based on BEMT considering three-dimensional viscous effects. Compared with OUM, modified OUM obtained the C-L and C-D from discretize propeller model open water characteristic CFD computation results so that the method could be more similar to the discretize propeller model. The computation conditions are same as the model test and the computational results show good match with model test data. The results show that considering the three-dimensional viscous effect of propellers can improve the simulation accuracy of propulsion model. The CFD computation results of open water characteristics show the modified OUM has less than 2% difference compared with the discretized propeller models and higher prediction accuracy than OUM. The self-propulsion free running computational results of thrust, velocity distribution, free-surface cuts and self-propulsion parameters using modified OUM model have been compared with EFD and discretized propeller model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据