4.3 Article

The utility of visceral fat level measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis in predicting metabolic syndrome

期刊

OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 519-523

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2020.09.008

关键词

Visceral fat level; Obesity; Metabolic syndrome; Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

资金

  1. National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan [HCH 103-046]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [106-2314-B-002-237-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Visceral adipose tissue dysfunction contributes to metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to investigate the association between visceral fat level measured by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and MetS. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study recruited Taiwanese volunteers aged >= 20 years between 2012 and 2014. Anthropometric measurements and plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, and lipid profiles were collected after at least 8 h of fasting. Insulin resistance was calculated by the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Visceral fat level (VFL, ranges: 1-59) and trunk fat percentage were measured through by the Body Composition Analyzer TANITA AB 140 Viscan. Results: A total of 1086 volunteers (mean age = 44.2 +/- 13.2 years) were enrolled. Multiple regression analyses showed that triglycerides levels and blood pressure increased while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased with VFL in both genders (p < 0.05). Increased HOMA-IR and VFL had a synergistic effect on MetS. Higher VFL was independently associated with MetS in both men (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19-1.48) and women (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17-1.39). Conclusions: Higher VFL is associated with MetS and its components. The portable BIA machine is easily applicable and useful tool to measure visceral fat in the community setting. (c) 2020 Asia Oceania Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据