4.8 Article

FlyRNAi.org-the database of the Drosophila RNAi screening center and transgenic RNAi project: 2021 update

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 D1, 页码 D908-D915

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa936

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH NIGMS [P41 GM132087, NIGMS R01 GM084947, NIGMS R01 GM067761, R24 OD26435, R24 OD021997]
  2. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center - NIH NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA006516]
  3. NIGMS [P41 GM132087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The FlyRNAi database at DRSC/TRiP provides online resources for functional genomics studies, focusing on Drosophila melanogaster. It includes gene-centric, reagent-centric, and data-centric resources to aid in ortholog mapping, identifying RNAi and CRISPR sgRNA reagents, and visualizing transcriptomics data and protein interactions. These features help biological and biomedical researchers efficiently integrate and analyze information for Drosophila and other species in functional genomics workflows.
The FlyRNAi database at the Drosophila RNAi Screening Center and Transgenic RNAi Project (DRSC/TRiP) provides a suite of online resources that facilitate functional genomics studies with a special emphasis on Drosophila melanogaster. Currently, the database provides: gene-centric resources that facilitate ortholog mapping and mining of information about orthologs in common genetic model species; reagent-centric resources that help researchers identify RNAi and CRISPR sgRNA reagents or designs; and data-centric resources that facilitate visualization and mining of transcriptomics data, protein modification data, protein interactions, and more. Here, we discuss updated and new features that help biological and biomedical researchers efficiently identify, visualize, analyze, and integrate information and data for Drosophila and other species. Together, these resources facilitate multiple steps in functional genomics workflows, from building gene and reagent lists to management, analysis, and integration of data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据