4.6 Review

Microbial platform technology for recombinant antibody fragment production: A review

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 31-42

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/1040841X.2016.1150959

关键词

Antibody fragments; bacterial platform; POP expression vector; recombinant antibody; secretary system

资金

  1. SERB, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (DST Fast Track Grant) [SR/FT/LS-31/2012]
  2. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India [42-457/2013(SR)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recombinant antibody fragments are being used for the last few years as an important therapeutic protein to cure various critical and life threatening human diseases. Several expression platforms now days employed for the production of these recombinant fragments, out of which bacterial system has emerged a promising host for higher expression. Since, a small antibody fragment unlike full antibody does not require human-like post-translational modification therefore it is potentially expressed in prokaryotic production system. Recently, small antibody fragments such as scFvs (single-chain variable fragments) and Fabs (antibody fragments) which does not require glycosylation are successfully produced in bacteria and have commercially launched for therapeutic use as these fragments shows better tissue penetration and less immunogenic to human body compared to full-size antibody. Recently developed Wacker's ESETEC secretion technology is an efficient technology for the expression and secretion of the antibody fragment (Fab) exceeded up to 4.0 g/L while scFv up to 3.5 g/L into the fermentation broth. The Pfenex system and pOP prokaryotic expression vector are another platform used for the considerably good amount of antibody fragment production successfully. In this review, we summarize the recent progress on various expression platforms and cloning approaches for the production of different forms of antibody fragments in E. coli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据