4.6 Article

Development of laboratory-scale sequential electrokinetic and biological treatment of chronically hydrocarbon-impacted soils

期刊

NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 38-44

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.04.002

关键词

Hydrocarbon; Historically contaminated soil; Electrokinetic remediation; Bioremediation; Soil pollution; Sequential remediation treatments

资金

  1. University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest through GNaC 2018 ARUT/ELBIOCOM project [14/15.10.2018]
  2. Academy of Romanian Scientists [23/02.05.2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the remediation of a chronically diesel-polluted soil by combining an electrokinetic treatment with a variety of bioremediation approaches. Priority within the sequential treatment was given to electrokinetic remediation (EKR) since the application of natural attenuation (NA), biostimulation and site-specific bio-augmentation resulted in very low degradation performance for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic hydrocarbons (PAH). The application of 20-day EKR (1.0 V cm(-1) with polarity reversal) led to 47.2 % and 46.2 % removal of TPH and PAH, respectively, and exerted a negative impact on bacterial abundance, as determined indirectly by quantitative PCR of 16S rRNA genes and community function, as investigated by community-level physiological profiling. These adverse effects were transient and, after a 50-day NA treatment applied downstream from EKR, bacterial abundance was an order of magnitude higher than that found in the initial soil and TPH and PAH removals were significantly higher than those attained by EKR (64.1 % and 56.3 %, respectively). The combination of EKR with site-specific bioaugmentation led to the greatest TPH and PAH degradation (76.0 % and 78.6 %, respectively). The results indicate that bioremediation can be successfully applied downstream from EKR and that the adverse effects exerted by this physico-chemical approach on soil microbiota are reversible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据