4.4 Review

Simulation for skills training in neurosurgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of progressive scholarly acceptance

期刊

NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 1853-1867

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01378-0

关键词

Simulation; Virtual reality; Augmented reality; Neurosurgery; Meta-analysis; Progressive scholarly acceptance

资金

  1. Imperial College London
  2. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)
  3. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) University College London (UCL) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through a systematic review and meta-analysis of global studies, it is evident that simulation plays a crucial role in clinical training, significantly improving clinical skills. However, there are differences in the types of simulators used and the global acceptance, indicating room for improvement and further research in this area.
At a time of significant global unrest and uncertainty surrounding how the delivery of clinical training will unfold over the coming years, we offer a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bibliometric analysis of global studies showing the crucial role simulation will play in training. Our aim was to determine the types of simulators in use, their effectiveness in improving clinical skills, and whether we have reached a point of global acceptance. A PRISMA-guided global systematic review of the neurosurgical simulators available, a meta-analysis of their effectiveness, and an extended analysis of their progressive scholarly acceptance on studies meeting our inclusion criteria of simulation in neurosurgical education were performed. Improvement in procedural knowledge and technical skills was evaluated. Of the identified 7405 studies, 56 studies met the inclusion criteria, collectively reporting 50 simulator types ranging from cadaveric, low-fidelity, and part-task to virtual reality (VR) simulators. In all, 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 7 randomised controlled trials. A random effects, ratio of means effects measure quantified statistically significant improvement in procedural knowledge by 50.2% (ES 0.502; CI 0.355; 0.649,p< 0.001), technical skill including accuracy by 32.5% (ES 0.325; CI - 0.482; - 0.167,p< 0.001), and speed by 25% (ES - 0.25, CI - 0.399; - 0.107,p< 0.001). The initial number of VR studies (n= 91) was approximately double the number of refining studies (n= 45) indicating it is yet to reach progressive scholarly acceptance. There is strong evidence for a beneficial impact of adopting simulation in the improvement of procedural knowledge and technical skill. We show a growing trend towards the adoption of neurosurgical simulators, although we have not fully gained progressive scholarly acceptance for VR-based simulation technologies in neurosurgical education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据