4.4 Article

Radiation exposure of computed tomography imaging for the assessment of acute stroke

期刊

NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 511-518

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02548-z

关键词

Computed tomography perfusion; Radiation exposure; Stroke

资金

  1. University Medicine Essen Academy (UMEA) program - German Research Foundation (DFG) [FU356/12-1]
  2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the radiation exposure of CT protocols for suspected acute stroke and established diagnostic reference levels. The results showed that additional CT techniques such as CTA and CTP contribute significantly to the total radiation exposure in the assessment of acute stroke.
Purpose To assess suspected acute stroke, the computed tomography (CT) protocol contains a non-contrast CT (NCCT), a CT angiography (CTA), and a CT perfusion (CTP). Due to assumably high radiation doses of the complete protocol, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and to establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Methods In this retrospective study, dose data of 921 patients with initial CT imaging for suspected acute stroke and dose monitoring with a DICOM header-based tracking and monitoring software were analyzed. Between June 2017 and January 2020, 1655 CT scans were included, which were performed on three different modern multi-slice CT scanners, including 921 NCCT, 465 CTA, and 269 CTP scans. Radiation exposure was reported for CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP). DRLs were set at the 75th percentile of dose distribution. Results DRLs were assessed for each step (CTDIvol/DLP): NCCT 33.9 mGy/527.8 mGy cm and CTA 13.7 mGy/478.3 mGy cm. Radiation exposure of CTP was invariable and depended on CT device and its protocol settings with CTDI(vol)124.9-258.2 mGy and DLP 1852.6-3044.3 mGy cm. Conclusion Performing complementary CT techniques such as CTA and CTP for the assessment of acute stroke increases total radiation exposure. Hence, the revised DRLs for the complete protocol are required, where our local DRLs may help as benchmarks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据