4.4 Article

Qualitative versus automatic evaluation of CT perfusion parameters in acute posterior circulation ischaemic stroke

期刊

NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 317-330

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02517-6

关键词

CT perfusion; Posterior ischaemic stroke; Perfusion maps; Automatic; RAPID

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2013-02357885]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of qualitative evaluation of software-generated colour maps and automatic assessment of CTP parameters in detecting acute posterior circulation strokes. The results showed that qualitative analysis of colour-coded maps was more sensitive and accurate in the detection of ischaemic changes compared to automatic quantitative analysis.
Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy (ACC) in the detection of acute posterior circulation strokes between qualitative evaluation of software-generated colour maps and automatic assessment of CT perfusion (CTP) parameters. Methods Were retrospectively collected 50 patients suspected of acute posterior circulation stroke who underwent to CTP (GE Lightspeed, 64 slices) within 24 h after symptom onset between January 2016 and December 2018. The Posterior circulation-Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) was used for quantifying the extent of ischaemic areas on non-contrast (NC)CT and colour-coded maps generated by CTP4 (GE) and RAPID (iSchemia View) software. Final pc-ASPECTS was calculated on follow-up NCCT and/or MRI (Philips Intera 3.0 T or Philips Achieva Ingenia 1.5 T). RAPID software also elaborated automatic quantitative mismatch maps. Results By qualitative evaluation of colour-coded maps, MTT-CTP4D and Tmax-RAPID showed the highest sensitivity (SE) (88.6% and 90.9%, respectively) and ACC (84% and 88%, respectively) compared with the other perfusion parameters (CBV, CBF). Baseline NCCT and CBF provided by RAPID quantitative perfusion mismatch maps had the lowest SE (29.6% and 6.8%, respectively) and ACC (38% and 18%, respectively). CBF and Tmax assessment provided by quantitative RAPID perfusion mismatch maps showed significant lower SE and ACC than qualitative evaluation. No significant differences were found between the pc-ASPECTSs assessed on colour-coded MTT and Tmax maps neither between the scores assessed on colour-coded CBV-CTP4D and CBF-RAPID maps. Conclusion Qualitative analysis of colour-coded maps resulted more sensitive and accurate in the detection of ischaemic changes than automatic quantitative analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据