4.5 Article

Neurological soft signs (NSS) and cognitive deficits in HIV associated neurocognitive disorder

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107545

关键词

Neurological soft signs (NSS); HIV Associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND); HIV; Cognition

资金

  1. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica de Chile (CONICYT) through Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientffico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT) [11121301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurological soft signs (NSS) are frequently found in severe mental disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia or HIV associated neumcognitive disorder (HAND) which includes asymptomatic neumcognitive impairment (ANI), mild neumcognitive disorder (MND) and HIV-associated dementia. To characterize NSS in patients with HIV we examined them with respect to neuropsychological deficits typically found in the disorder. 67 HIV + patients without a history of head trauma, opportunistic infections, severe psychiatric disorders or acute confounding comorbidities of the Central nervous system (CNS) were recruited. NSS and neumpsychological deficits were examined on the Heidelberg scale and the Cambridge Neumpsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), respectively. Semantic and phonemic verbal fluency were additionally established. According to NIMH and NINDS criteria, 18 patients were diagnosed with ANI and 21 with MND, 28 showed no cognitive deficits. NSS total scores were significantly correlated with several cognitive domains and NSS subscales. These correlations were confirmed when motor performance was entered as a covariate. According to our findings, NSS in HIV positive patients are significantly correlated with deficits in a broad range of neuropsychological domains. Similar findings were reported in schizophrenia, emphasizing the transdiagnostic character of NSS and supporting NSS examination in screening HIV patients for HAND.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据