4.7 Article

Nalfurafine modulates the reinforcing effects of oxycodone in male and female adolescent C57BL/6J mice

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108244

关键词

Nalfurafine; Oxycodone self-administration; Conditioned place preference; Hot plate test; Male and female adolescent C57BL/6J mice

资金

  1. Dr.Miriam and Sheldeon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Addiction to prescription opioid, such as oxycodone, has affected millions of adolescents and young adults. Kappa opioid receptor (KOP-r) agonist can counterbalance the euphoria effects of mu opioid agonists like oxycodone. Nalfurafine is a KOP-r agonist. The current study examined how nalfurafine affected the reinforcing-effect of oxycodone in adolescent male and female mice using intravenous self-administration (SA) and conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigms. Adolescent mice (5 week-old) first received surgery for catheter implantation. After recovery, mice were then placed into the SA chambers and allowed to self-administer oxycodone, 2 h per day for 14 days. Following 14 day oxycodone SA, mice were injected with saline and a single dose of nalfurafine (10, 20, 30, 40 mu g/kg, s.c.) 10 min before each oxycodone SA session for 5 consecutive days. The mice were then injected with Nor-BNI (10 mg/kg, i.p.) 24 h before oxycodone SA following injection of nalfurafine (40 mu g/kg, s.c.). Separate groups of male and female adolescent mice underwent oxycodone CPP or hot plate test with or without nalfurafine preinjection. Nalfurafine decreased oxycodone SA in a dose dependent manner. Nor-BNI blocked the effect of nalfurafine on oxycodone SA. Nalfurafine significantly attenuated the oxycodone-induced hyperlocomotor activities and CPP, but enhanced oxycodone-induced analgesia. In conclusion, nalfurafine reduced the reinforcing effects of oxycodone in male and female adolescent mice. Nalfurafine also increased oxycodone-induced antinociception.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据