4.5 Article

Tetradecyl 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate alleviates oligodendrocyte damage following chronic cerebral hypoperfusion through IGF-1 receptor

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2020.104749

关键词

Cognitive deficits; Demyelination; Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor; Oligodendrocyte; Vascular dementia

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR17H310001, LYY18H310004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81722045, 81673405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, there is no effective therapy for chronic cerebral hypoperfusion-induced subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD), which displays cognitive deficits and progressive white matter damage. Tetradecyl 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate (ABG-001) is a lead compound derived from gentisides with neuritogenic activity. In this report, we intended to investigate the effect of ABG-001 on the SIVD experimental model through right unilateral common carotid arteries occlusion (rUCCAO) in mice. We found that ABG-001 remarkably alleviated white matter damage and cognitive deficits after cerebral hypoperfusion induced by rUCCAO. The protection of ABG-001 on the white matter was related to an amelioration of the oligodendrocyte apoptosis and demyelination rather than promoting remyelination. Molecular docking study showed that ABG-001 possesses a high affinity for insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), but not for tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA). The protection of ABG-001 against oligodendrocyte damage was abrogated by IGF-1R antagonist or knockdown of IGF-1R through shRNA, but not TrkA antagonist. Moreover, ABG-001 did not induce hematological, renal or hepatic toxicity after chronic treatment. The present study indicates that ABG-001 protects oligodendrocytes through IGF-1R to relieve demyelination following chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, which could be represented as an encouraging treatment for SIVD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据