4.7 Article

Neuroinflammation and histone H3 citrullination are increased in X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism post-mortem prefrontal cortex

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105032

关键词

Citrullination; Neuroinflammation; X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism

资金

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital Collaborative Center for X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroinflammation plays a pathogenic role in neurodegenerative diseases and recent findings suggest that it may also be involved in X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism (XDP) pathogenesis. Previously, fibroblasts and neuronal stem cells derived from XDP patients demonstrated hypersensitivity to TNF-alpha, dysregulation in NF kappa B signaling, and an increase in several pro-inflammatory markers. However, the role of inflammatory processes in XDP patient brain remains unknown. Here we demonstrate that there is a significant increase in astrogliosis and microgliosis in human post-mortem XDP prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to control. Furthermore, there is a significant increase in histone H3 citrullination (H3R2R8R17cit(3)) with a concomitant increase in peptidylarginine deaminase 2 (PAD2) and 4 (PAD4), the enzymes catalyzing citrullination, in XDP post-mortem PFC. While there is a significant increase in myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels in XDP PFC, neutrophil elastase (NE) levels are not altered, suggesting that MPO may be released by activated microglia or reactive astrocytes in the brain. Similarly, there was an increase in H3R2R8R17cit(3), PAD2 and PAD4 levels in XDP-derived fibroblasts. Importantly, treatment of fibroblasts with Cl-amidine, a pan inhibitor of PAD enzymes, reduced histone H3 citrullination and pro-inflammatory chemokine expression, without affecting cell survival. Taken together, our results demonstrate that inflammation is increased in XDP post-mortem brain and fibroblasts and unveil a new epigenetic potential therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据