4.5 Article

Longitudinal trajectories of hippocampal volume in middle to older age community dwelling individuals

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 97-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.10.011

关键词

Hippocampus; Aging; Trajectory; Longitudinal; Middle age MRI

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
  2. NHMRC [973302, 179805, 350833, 157125, 1102694]
  3. ARC [130101705]
  4. NICTA
  5. Australian Commonwealth Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding heterogeneity in brain aging trajectories is crucial for optimizing aging outcomes. This study investigated hippocampal changes in middle-aged and older individuals, finding different rates of volume decrease in different age groups. Men experienced steeper declines in middle age, while a subgroup of older participants maintained stable volumes.
Understanding heterogeneity in brain aging trajectories is important to estimate the extent to which aging outcomes can be optimized. Although brain changes in late life are well-characterized, brain changes in middle age are not well understood. In this study, we investigated hippocampal change in a generally healthy community-living population of middle (n = 421, mean age 47.2 years) and older age (n = 411, mean age 63.0 years) individuals, over a follow-up of up to 12 years. Manually traced hippocampal volumes were analyzed using multilevel models and latent class analysis to investigate longitudinal aging trajectories and laterality and sex effects, and to identify subgroups that follow different aging trajectories. Hippocampal volumes decreased on average by 0.18%/year in middle age and 0.3%/year in older age. Men tended to experience steeper declines than women in middle age only. Three subgroups of individuals following different trajectories were identified in middle age and 2 in older age. Contrary to expectations, the subgroup containing two-thirds of older age participants maintained stable hippocampal volumes across the follow-up. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据