4.8 Article

Subclonal reconstruction of tumors by using machine learning and population genetics

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 52, 期 9, 页码 898-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0675-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [A19771, A22909, A24566] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_18051, MC_PC_16047, MR/P000789/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCI NIH HHS [U54 CA217376] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [105104/Z/14/Z, 202778, 202778/B/16/Z, 209409, 105104, 209409/Z/17/Z, 202778/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Wellcome Trust [209409/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. MRC [MR/P000789/1, MC_PC_18051, MC_PC_16047] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MOBSTER is an approach for subclonal reconstruction of tumors from cancer genomics data on the basis of models that combine machine learning with evolutionary theory, thus leading to more accurate evolutionary histories of tumors. Most cancer genomic data are generated from bulk samples composed of mixtures of cancer subpopulations, as well as normal cells. Subclonal reconstruction methods based on machine learning aim to separate those subpopulations in a sample and infer their evolutionary history. However, current approaches are entirely data driven and agnostic to evolutionary theory. We demonstrate that systematic errors occur in the analysis if evolution is not accounted for, and this is exacerbated with multi-sampling of the same tumor. We present a novel approach for model-based tumor subclonal reconstruction, called MOBSTER, which combines machine learning with theoretical population genetics. Using public whole-genome sequencing data from 2,606 samples from different cohorts, new data and synthetic validation, we show that this method is more robust and accurate than current techniques in single-sample, multiregion and longitudinal data. This approach minimizes the confounding factors of nonevolutionary methods, thus leading to more accurate recovery of the evolutionary history of human cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据