4.8 Article

An integrated multi-omics approach identifies epigenetic alterations associated with Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 52, 期 10, 页码 1024-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0696-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Aging [P01-AG031862]
  2. Kleber foundation
  3. NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R35-NS097275]
  4. NIAGADS [U24-AG041689]
  5. Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases [U54-AG052427]
  6. NIH [R01-NS111997, AI118891]
  7. [R01-HG006827]
  8. [T32-AG00255]
  9. [AG10124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein aggregation is the hallmark of neurodegeneration, but the molecular mechanisms underlying late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) are unclear. Here we integrated transcriptomic, proteomic and epigenomic analyses of postmortem human brains to identify molecular pathways involved in AD. RNA sequencing analysis revealed upregulation of transcription- and chromatin-related genes, including the histone acetyltransferases for H3K27ac and H3K9ac. An unbiased proteomic screening singled out H3K27ac and H3K9ac as the main enrichments specific to AD. In turn, epigenomic profiling revealed gains in the histone H3 modifications H3K27ac and H3K9ac linked to transcription, chromatin and disease pathways in AD. Increasing genome-wide H3K27ac and H3K9ac in a fly model of AD exacerbated amyloid-beta 42-driven neurodegeneration. Together, these findings suggest that AD involves a reconfiguration of the epigenome, wherein H3K27ac and H3K9ac affect disease pathways by dysregulating transcription- and chromatin-gene feedback loops. The identification of this process highlights potential epigenetic strategies for early-stage disease treatment. Multi-omic profiling of brain tissue from patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) identifies gains in H3K27ac and H3K9ac linked to transcription and disease pathways. Increasing H3K27ac and H3K9ac in a fly model of AD exacerbates neurodegeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据