4.8 Article

Peroxisome compartmentalization of a toxic enzyme improves alkaloid production

期刊

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-00668-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [MCB 1818307]
  2. Center for Cellular Construction
  3. NSF Science and Technology Center [DBI-1548297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that by targeting the toxic enzyme NCS to the peroxisome and enlarging peroxisomes through the expression of engineered transcription factors, the production of (S)-reticuline and other alkaloids can be increased efficiently.
Eukaryotic cells compartmentalize metabolic pathways in organelles to achieve optimal reaction conditions and avoid crosstalk with cytosolic factors. We found that cytosolic expression of norcoclaurine synthase (NCS), the enzyme that catalyzes the first committed reaction in benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, is toxic inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeand, consequently, restricts (S)-reticuline production. We developed a compartmentalization strategy that alleviates NCS toxicity while promoting increased (S)-reticuline titer. This strategy is achieved through efficient targeting of toxic NCS to the peroxisome while, crucially, taking advantage of the free flow of metabolite substrates and products across the peroxisome membrane. We demonstrate that expression of engineered transcription factors can mimic the oleate response for larger peroxisomes, further increasing benzylisoquinoline alkaloid titer without the requirement for peroxisome induction with fatty acids. This work specifically addresses the challenges associated with toxic NCS expression and, more broadly, highlights the potential for engineering organelles with desired characteristics for metabolic engineering. Increased production of (S)-reticuline and other alkaloids is achieved through alleviating norcoclaurine synthase toxicity by targeting the enzyme to the peroxisome plus enlarging peroxisomes by expression of engineered transcription factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据